| 年级 | 总人数 | 通过(≥2.0) | 不通过(0-1.9) | 优秀(≥6.0) | 良好(4.0-5.9) | 及格(2.0-3.9) | 不及格(1.0-1.9) | 警告(0.1-0.9) | 严重警告(＝0) |
| 2008 | 252 | 249 (98.0%) | 5 (2.0%) | 97 (38.2%) | 42 (16.5%) | 110 (43.3%) | 4 (1.6%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2009 | 243 | 170 (70.0%) | 73 (30.0%) | 73 (30.0%) | 43 (17.7%) | 54 (22.2%) | 31 (12.8%) | 25 (10.3%) | 17 (7.0%) |
| 2010 | 278 | 44 (15.8%) | 234 (84.2%) | 4 (1.4%) | 4 (1.4%) | 36 (12.9%) | 83 (29.9%) | 119 (42.8%) | 32 (11.5%) |
| 2011 | 248 | 5 (2.0%) | 243 (98.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (2.0%) | 25 (10.1%) | 78 (31.5%) | 140 (56.5%) |
| 年级 | 序号 | SRTP | 研学 | 竞赛 | 论文 | 专利 | 报告 | 其它 | 总分 |
| 2008 | 合计 | 641.7 | 53.9 | 761.0 | 64.2 | 14.4 | 188.0 | 14.8 | 1738 |
| 比例 | 36.90% | 3.10% | 43.80% | 3.70% | 0.80% | 10.80% | 0.90% | - | |
| 平均 | 2.526 | 0.212 | 2.996 | 0.253 | 0.057 | 0.74 | 0.058 | 6.843 | |
| 2009 | 合计 | 323.6 | 34.5 | 696.5 | 3.8 | 0 | 117.1 | 10.8 | 1186.3 |
| 比例 | 27.30% | 2.90% | 58.70% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 9.90% | 0.90% | - | |
| 平均 | 1.332 | 0.142 | 2.866 | 0.016 | 0 | 0.482 | 0.044 | 4.882 | |
| 2010 | 合计 | 5.4 | 0 | 145.0 | 0.6 | 0 | 162.4 | 17.8 | 331.2 |
| 比例 | 1.60% | 0.00% | 43.80% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 49.00% | 5.40% | - | |
| 平均 | 0.019 | 0 | 0.522 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.584 | 0.064 | 1.191 | |
| 2011 | 合计 | 0 | 0 | 34.0 | 0 | 0 | 38.7 | 0 | 72.7 |
| 比例 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 46.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 53.20% | 0.00% | - | |
| 平均 | 0 | 0 | 0.137 | 0 | 0 | 0.156 | 0 | 0.293 |
